Predicative Metaphor Comprehension as Indirect Categorization
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, we address the problem of how people understand predicative metaphors such as “The rumor flew through the office,” and argue that predicative metaphors are understood as indirect categorizations. In the indirect categorization process, the verb (e.g., fly) of a predicative metaphor evokes an intermediate entity, which in turn evokes a metaphoric category of actions or states (e.g., “to spread rapidly and soon disappear”) to be attributed to the target noun (e.g., rumor), rather than directly creating a metaphoric category as argued by Glucksberg’s (2001) categorization theory. We test our argument using two experiments, offline comprehension and online priming. The two experiments provided convergent evidence for our argument. The psychological validity of indirect categorization as a process of predicative metaphor comprehension was confirmed.
منابع مشابه
Predicative Metaphors Are Understood as Two-Stage Categorization: Computational Evidence by Latent Semantic Analysis
In this paper, we address the problem of how people understand predicative metaphors such as “The rumor flew through the office”, and argue that two-stage categorization is the process via which predicative metaphors are understood. In the two-stage categorization process, the verb of a predicative metaphor (e.g., fly) evokes an intermediate category, which in turn evokes a metaphorical categor...
متن کاملComputational Exploration of Metaphor Comprehension Processes
A central question in metaphor research is what processes are involved in metaphor comprehension, especially which of comparison and categorization processes governs metaphor comprehension. In this paper, I attempt to provide a computational solution to this problem using comparison and categorization algorithms based on word vectors in a multidimensional semantic space constructed by latent se...
متن کاملMetaphor Comprehension : From Comparison to Categorization
In this paper, we explore the relationship between metaphor and polysemy . We begin by discussing how novel metaphoric mappings can create new word meanings in the form of domain-general representations. Turning next to consider the implications of this view for the on-line comprehension of figurative language, we suggest that there is a shift from comparison processing to categorization proces...
متن کاملMetaphor as Categorization: A Connectionist Implementation
A key issue for models of metaphor comprehension is to explain how, in some metaphorical comparison “A is B,” only some features of B are transferred to A. The features of B that are transferred to A depend both on A and on B. This is the central thrust of Black’s (1979) well-known interaction theory of metaphor comprehension. However, this theory is somewhat abstract, and it is not obvious how...
متن کاملAn Eye For Figurative Meaning: The Effects of Familiarity on Metaphor Comprehension
The career of metaphor hypothesis suggests that processing preference is a result of conventionality whereby conventional metaphors are processed through categorization, and novel ones processed through comparison. Alternatively, the categorization model predicts that apt metaphors are processed as categorizations whether or not they are conventional. However, research has largely ignored anoth...
متن کامل